White House moves to strengthen ObamaCare contraception requirement
The Biden administration is proposing an expansion of contraceptive coverage, including removing moral exemptions finalized under the Trump administration that made it easier for private health plans and insurers to exclude coverage of birth control.
The proposal, released Monday by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Treasury, and Labor would remove the moral exemption but retain the existing religious exemption.
Employers are not required to notify HHS if they have a moral objection. The agency said far more employers have invoked religious objections than moral; About 18 employers have claimed that exemption and around 15 employees are affected.
It would also establish a new independent pathway for individuals enrolled in plans or coverage offered by religious employers to obtain contraceptive services at no cost directly from a willing provider or facility that furnishes contraceptive services.
This would allow women and covered dependents to “navigate their own care and still obtain birth control at no cost in the event their plan or insurer has a religious exemption,” the agencies said in the proposal.
The proposal aims to strengthen ObamaCare’s free contraception requirements while also balancing the religious objections certain employers have to providing that service. The law requires all health insurance offered by the vast majority of employers to cover at least one of 18 forms of birth control approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
The so-called “individual contraceptive arrangement” would be available to the participant, beneficiary, or enrollee without the plan sponsor or issuer having to take any action it objects to.
“Simply put, the action is undertaken by the individual, for the individual,” the agencies said in the proposal.
Ensuring access to contraception at no cost “is a national public health imperative,” the agencies said, as it can help women “exercise control over their reproductive health and family planning decisions, particularly in states with prohibitions or tight restrictions on abortion.”
In addition, the US Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization “has placed a heightened importance on access to contraceptive services nationwide,” the agencies said in the proposal.
“Now more than ever, access to and coverage of birth control is critical as the Biden-Harris Administration works to help ensure women everywhere can get the contraception they need, when they need it, and – thanks to the ACA – with no out- of-pocket cost,” HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra said in a statement.
Under the Trump administration rules issued in 2018, entities that have “sincerely held religious beliefs” against providing contraceptives are not required to do so.
The rule extended the provision to organizations and small businesses that have objections “on the basis of moral conviction which is not based on any particular religious belief.”
The rules apply to all nonprofit and for-profit employers with sincerely held religious objections, as well as private universities and colleges with religious objections with respect to student health insurance coverage.
The current rule allows employers to invoke an accommodation so they don’t have to provide coverage for birth control, so long as women still were able to receive birth control seamlessly, without any barriers.
But under the rule, employers that object to providing coverage are not required to inform participants that the plan does not cover contraceptive services, and the accommodation is optional. There are no alternative mechanisms to provide contraceptive coverage for affected women—leaving many women without coverage, the agencies said.